COMPANY OVERVIEW

Updated 01.21.2010

 

Summary: JP Morgan needs to improve its Board of Directors and Senior Management scores as well as its scores on its Internal Control Environment.

 

JP Morgan’s overall Board of Directors and Senior management score has been affected by weak Board effectiveness. Some key measures such as director stock ownership guidelines and other critical governance measures are in place. On its Internal Control Environment the company faces some challenges in its Board Audit Committee composition as well as a few potential Conflict of Interest situations. On the Social and Environmental front, JP Morgan scores exceptionally well. It discloses many environmental metrics such as emissions, electricity consumption and extent of lending to minorities.

 

Registered members can view a detailed analysis of individual sections by clicking on the tabs above.

 

 

 

Related Posts

Detailed Scorecard

SCORECARD & FACTSHEET

Board Size: 11

Board of Directors Compensation($): $75,000- Deferred Stock Award- $170,000

Total Emissions(metric tons): 2008- 952,646; 2007- 986,869

Amount received in Government Bailout($): $25 Billion

Amount received in Government Bailout repaid($): $25 Billion (repaid on 6/17/2009)

Total CEO compensation for 2008($): $19.65 million

Chief Risk Officer: Barry L.Zubrow

Changes in Chief Risk Officer over the past 2 years**: None

Tenure of Chief Risk Officer in this position: Barry Zubrow has held the position of Chief Risk Officer at JP Morgan Chase since 2007.

** Why do we look at ‘Changes in Chief Risk Officer’?  Companies, where we observe quick changes to senior risk positions (in case of companies in the finance industry) are high on our ‘watch’ list.